When navigating family law disputes with cross-border elements or involving foreign nationals residing in Turkey, one of the most critical questions concerns how financial liabilities and marital misconduct are assessed. Under the Turkish Civil Code (TCC), the determination of fault plays a central role in deciding whether a party is entitled to Pecuniary and Non-pecuniary Compensation upon divorce.
Contrary to common misconceptions regarding potential legislative reforms toward a purely “no-fault” framework, fault remains a core pillar in Turkish contested divorce proceedings (çekişmeli boşanma).
The Role of Fault in Turkish Divorce Proceedings
Under Turkish Law, grounds for divorce are divided into specific grounds (such as adultery, life-threatening behavior, or crime) and general grounds (irretrievable breakdown of marriage under Article 166 of the TCC). In contested divorces based on general grounds, the court must carefully evaluate the evidence to establish the fault ratio of each spouse.
Turkish family courts categorize marital misconduct into varying degrees:
- Equal Fault: Both spouses contributed equally to the breakdown of the marriage.
- More Faulty / Less Faulty: One spouse’s breach of marital duties significantly outweighs the other’s.
- Sole Fault : One spouse is entirely responsible for the marital breakdown, while the other carries no fault.
Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Compensation under Article 174 of the TCC
Financial compensation in Turkish divorce actions is explicitly governed by Article 174 ofthe Turkish Civil Code. To be awarded damages, specific statutory criteria regarding fault and harm must be met.
1. Pecuniary Compensation
Article 174/1 provides that the blameless or less faulty spouse whose existing or expected financial benefits have been harmed by the divorce may demand reasonable material damages from the faulty party.
- Eligibility: The party claiming compensation must be faultless or less faulty than the defendant. A spouse found to be equally or more at fault cannot claim Pecuniary Compensation.
- Assessment: Courts consider loss of spousal support, loss of prospective inheritance rights, and direct financial expectations tied to the marital union.
2. Non-Pecuniary Compensation
Article 174/2 allows a spouse whose personal rights have been violated due to the events leading to the divorce to request non-pecuniary damages.
- Eligibility: Similar to pecuniary claims, non-pecuniary damages are awarded only to the faultless or less faulty spouse.
- Grounds: Acts such as physical abuse, severe verbal insult, public humiliation, infidelity, or emotional neglect are recognized by the Court of Cassation as grounds violating personal rights.
Key Principles & Court Practices
- Equal Fault Bar: When the court determines that both parties share equal fault, claims for both pecuniary and non-pecuniary compensation are dismissed.
- Determination of Alimony: While temporary support (tedbir nafakası) is granted based on need during trial regardless of fault, post-divorce spousal maintenance (yoksulluk nafakası) requires that the requesting party must not be more faulty than the payor.
- Burden of Proof: Allegations of misconduct must be substantiated through credible evidence, such as witness testimonies, official reports, financial records, or electronic communications submitted in compliance with procedural rules.
Conclusion
Understanding the interplay between marital fault and monetary compensation is essential when dealing with contested divorce litigation in Turkey. Because financial awards and post-divorce support depend heavily on proving relative fault, securing diligent legal representation and structured evidence is critical to protecting personal and financial rights.
Need Legal Assistance with Family Law in Turkey?
Our team provides comprehensive legal representation in Turkish family law, cross-border divorces, and international asset division. Contact our office to schedule a consultation with an experienced Turkish family law attorney.